Info

You are currently browsing the archives for the Political stuff category.

January 2009
S M T W T F S
« Dec    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Links

Archive for the Political stuff Category

How much is $53,000,000,000,000?

teacuppamela.pngquotebegin.gifBy now, you may have heard about our acclaimed documentary I.O.U.S.A., a film that boldly examines the rapidly growing national debt and its consequences for the United States and its citizens. The film has been a huge hit, getting rave reviews from Roger Ebert and others.Now, we proudly release a 30-minute condensed version of I.O.U.S.A. designed specifically for watching and sharing on the web - for free.

So if you haven’t had a chance to see the movie yet, watch the condensed I.O.U.S.A. today. If you’ve already seen it in a theater, check out the abbreviated version for a refresher. Then, tell your friends, your family, your Facebook friends and your Twitter followers about the staggering amount of money - $53 trillion - in financial obligations owed by the federal government to foreign investors and to every single American in the form of pensions, health benefits, Social Security and Medicare.

Then, visit http://www.IOUSAtheMovie.com and join us in our Fiscal Wake-Up Movement. Together, we can make American fiscal responsibility a reality.”

 

 

And Bernanke says there is no comparison between these days  and the ‘Great Depression’ —  and makes that claim bcz he is a “scholar of The Great Depressionon… written books about the Depression…”    [ Right. ]

 

pamelasig2.jpg

O, what is upon us?

teacuppamela.png I’ve been pretty wrapped up these past days.  Our grandchildren had been with us for ten days and then this week has brought an amazing reuniting with a cousin I haven’t seen for over 40 years — I cannot even believe it though I’ve had a couple of days to consider it.  For a couple of days now I haven’t been able to keep thoughts straight as I have been thinking of our long conversation - things that never get talked about, family patterns, memories, tragedies and God’s wonderful redemption - beauty from ashes.

So…….. here I am browsing the news, catching up on mails and marveling over the events of these days.  O, truly, these surely must be last days.  O, I pray we will redeem the time - for these days - these days truly are evil days and the peril of this nation is evident.  O, for a remnant that will speak the Truth of God, stand up for the Word of God, His salvation and call to repentance.

Remember my ‘what if it’s true?‘ questions?  Well, what if it’s true?  What if it’s true that BObama is not genuinely a US born citizen?  What if it’s true that his birth certificate is not authentic?  I mean I’m just sayin…  A WorldNet Daily article on the matter.  Sad thing is that even if Obama is not a US born citizen - He’s been selected.  America will not (as a whole) stand for righteousness or stand for truth.

More articles of political interest at Judicial Watch

But…………………………….. you could also listen to this: A Call To Anguish - David Wilkerson
Powerful.   [Not light listening!!]   These are incredible days in which to be alive.  David Wilkerson distinguishes between anguish and concern.  Are you  little by little changing?  Are you, little by little, losing the love of God, the love of Christ?  Nehemiah didn’t ask: Why?   God is allowing much to happen in and to America… Daniel 9.

O, that men would turn to the LORD.

   pamelasig2.jpg

Not a far stretch. really.

 My mom sent me this one… I am remembering that truth is stranger than fiction.

obama's ridiculous promises

Thoughts on the election.

teacuppamela.pngAs I begin this blog entry, I’m staring out at the white heart-picket fence and the weeping willow tree branches are swaying in the rainy breeze… willow leaves cover the grass and puddles have formed in the wheel ruts of the lane… a squirrel just hopped out of the tire swing to make another nut run.

My thoughts are interrupted… and I begin to ponder: day after day the squirrels run back and forth — gathering and hoarding nuts for the winter.  I wonder if I ought to take lessons from them or attempt to brush off a lingering uneasiness regarding the seemingly tumultuous days ahead.  I wonder if we ought to “consider the ant…” and do more to store - do more to prepare - do more to fortify.  And then I remember I was going to write about the election.

I purposely didn’t write much about my personal stand/plan or voting conviction or opinion.  Not so much bcz everyone’s got one, but bcz it seemed as though discussions about the candidates sort of starts a firestorm in some gatherings and I really didn’t want to start or be a part of one.  So… now, after the fact I will share some of the titles of incomplete blog entries and perhaps after this post I will simply delete those message drafts. Here are a few Blog titles I see in my ‘drafts’ folder:  Really, What if it’s True? The Last Free Election!  The Right Woman for The Job! Who are You Going to Vote For?  One Vote Says A Lot.  On the Bandwagon… and a few more.

Here are a few things I wrote… and these thoughts will be jumbled and they are a compilation of several blog entries never posted and they are ‘old news’ now… but such as they were, here you go:

teacuppamela.pngI’ve heard people lament that this is the last “free” election in this country — presidential or otherwise.  No, it’s not.  The last free election was probably was likely 8 years ago - no, probably 12 years ago.  This (upcoming election) is not the last free election by a long shot.  The media — actors & actresses, political pawns along with political masterminds and forces to great for this small mind to comprehend routed this election and have essentially duped more than half the American people.  Amazing.

When I stop to consider for a few moments some of the more recent statements made by Barak Obama and his (what was he thinking?) running mate, Joe Biden, I just shake my head and sit here pretty much speechless - or, rather, voiceless. It’s not that there’s nothing to say — quite the contrary.  It’s that there appears to be few listening to voices of reason, voices of truth — voices with facts.  I listened to some “man-on-the-street” interviews (and no, I won’t link them here for obvious reasons - the radio talkshow host being the first), and the interviewer was asking random ‘voters’ basic questions about Barak Obama and the talking point facts used in the questions were actually not Barak Obama’s views at all.  The questions were something like:  That is, they would ask questions like this:  “Are you more for Obama’s policy because he’s pro-life, or because he thinks he our troops should stay in Iraq and finish this war?”  And they would say something like, ‘because he’s keeping the troops in Iraq’.

  But really… it’s scary to think that Obama will likely be elected and will do so never having clearly defined what the Change! (can ya hear it??) really means or what Change! will do to, will be, or will do for Mr. & Mrs. Average-Family or Mr. Not-so-Average-Whatever or for Mr. Got-a-Bunch.  Well, we know that Mr. Got-a-Bunch won’t, right off the bat.

I guess all we really know right now is that Barak Obama sounds like a child going around the class promising to give all the children candy and ice-cream everyday and telling them that they don’t have to do anything anymore… no chores, no schoolwork, no studying — no more rules — only recess from now on and they will have a guaranteed spot on the stage at the graduation ceremony — and the rich college students will do all their work from now on — hey! they already got an education - you haven’t gotten one yet — why should you have to work at your education? — you should have theirs! you deserve theirs!!.

For Joe Biden to be pleading with  folks to hang in there with them through the Change………………. it won’t be easy.  I’m thinkin’ - You got that one right.  It will not be easy to stand by an watch this country implode. further.  More Biden “Watch — we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy,” Biden assured. “I don’t know what the decision is going to be, but I promise you it will occur. As a student of history, and having served with seven presidents, I guarantee you it is going to happen.”  All this while also tipping his hand for *more taxes* on the rich — they’ll have to pay more tax because Appealing to the emotions - don’t you just hear a plea for saving Jack Kennedy?

But you know… interestingly, one cool thing (no pun intended) about all this rhetoric?  We haven’t really heard much from AlGore and global warming.  ‘Course… it is really, really cold this time of year.  I think it’s going to be a long, long winter… remember hanging chads, dimpled chads and all that stuff… Yep… it’s going to be a long winter… and already in Florida.

One vote.  It’s all it is: one vote.  One vote makes a bold statement.  One vote endorses a whole series of decisions.  One vote, for example, might say: Yeah, I endorse this person and everything s/he believes.  It says, I can trust them to speak for me on issues that concern me and my family — it says, I believe s/he will do the right thing, say the right thing and will fight for things I believe to be relevant or important to my family and my nation.  My vote is important.  O — believe me, I don’t for a minute feel that my vote will make a difference in the outcome of the upcoming election - but I will vote, nonetheless.  With that vote, I will be standing up for what I think is right — I won’t be voting for what I think is the lesser of two evils nor will I be voting for incremental change– no, no… I will not vote pragmatically.  I’ve done that before and couldn’t stand the ‘voter’s remorse’ the next day.  I won’t give into the notion that a vote for ______ is a vote for Obama.  I don’t believe that.  A vote for _____ is a vote for _____ and that’s that.O, when the tallies are posted and you see x-million for obama and x-million for mccain, the latter will have significantly fewer - and it will appear that votes for third party candidates just added to obama’s tally — but though it won’t be shown, the votes for others will be simply that - votes for others (and not obama).

The presidential election (and numerous other significant elections as well) in this country is just 6 weeks away.   In six weeks we will likely know the outcome of this ugly contest. For me, it will come none too soon.  The spurious attacks, the tawdry insinuations and baseless innuendos — it’s all been a shameful display of ruthlessness.

If I vote for Sarah Palin I will be saying, yeah… sure… she (and  it’s a good idea for Christian women) would be a great Vice President.  My vote for Sarah Palin would say:  O, all these things I believe, these things I write, these things I teach about marriage, motherhood and the home?? — well, they aren’t really true - or, rather, I don’t actually believe these things.   Yes, I believe she has a calling and I believe she’s the right woman for the job!  Yes, she is lovely and gifted and capable and strong — she’s just right for the job.  The LORD being her helper, she’s got what it takes, she’s qualified and she’s proving she’s got the tenacity to do the job God’s called her - yea, designed her to have.  I’m praying, I’m writing her and I’m hoping she will heed the call, that she will model for women - for Christian women all over the US - that her job - the job for which she’s been uniquely gifted, the job for which she is marvelously suited — yes, her job… her job is the most important, and she will *stay home* and *do it!*   My vote for JMcCain/Sarah Palin would be a vote for her to leave her calling.  And. I. won’t. do. that.

Then there’s the tireless Obamedia… and the obamessiah… mesmerizing the crowds… the swooning crowds — remember all the fainting in the summer??  [[man, I’ll bet some folks are fainting now as they realize just what they’ve done!!]] I wonder when an innocent child will say: Look, Mama… the emperor has no clothes!  Will anyone listen?  Will anyone admit the facade is what it is? Will anyone (who currently defends all “That One” says) let the scales be removed from their eyes and see the Truth?

It’s like there’s a pounding and the ground is crying out… and yet the Truth is being turned aside for a lie.  Do you hear it?  Do you hear the sound of the bandwagon?  It’s beckoning you to jump on… to climb aboard and go on for the ride.  You stand on the roadside, a hand to your forehead shielding your eyes from the brightness of the sun… and you might even wince at the deafening strains and the beat of the drums calling you to join in and dance on the bandwagon.

pamelasig2.jpg

Ronald Reagan - 1964 - could have been today.

As you listen, keep reminding yourself that the year was 1964.  This is not just another video; and, btw, the reason I use so much video is to punctuate reality and history.  Take 28 minutes and listen — you’ll be amazed at the timeliness of this message.  Surely this was  needed before this past Tuesday.

Rendezvous With Destiny - Ronald Reagan - 1964

teacuppamela.pngGo get a cuppa… this is long, but very worth the read.


quotebegin.gifOctober 27, 1964

Rendezvous with Destiny
Address on behalf of Senator Barry Goldwater

A Time of Choosing
Ronald Reagan

Thank you very much. Thank you and good evening. The sponsor has been identified, but unlike most television programs, the performer hasn’t been provided with a script. As a matter of fact, I have been permitted to choose my own ideas regarding the choice that we face in the next few weeks.

I have spent most of my life as a Democrat. I recently have seen fit to follow another course. I believe that the issues confronting us cross party lines. Now, one side in this campaign has been telling us that the issues of this election are the maintenance of peace and prosperity. The line has been used “We’ve never had it so good.”

But I have an uncomfortable feeling that this prosperity isn’t something on which we can base our hopes for the future. No nation in history has ever survived a tax burden that reached a third of its national income. Today, 37 cents of every dollar earned in this country is the tax collector’s share, and yet our government continues to spend $17 million a day more than the government takes in. We haven’t balanced our budget 28 out of the last 34 years. We have raised our debt limit three times in the last twelve months, and now our national debt is one and a half times bigger than all the combined debts of all the nations in the world. We have $15 billion in gold in our treasury–we don’t own an ounce. Foreign dollar claims are $27.3 billion, and we have just had announced that the dollar of 1939 will now purchase 45 cents in its total value.

As for the peace that we would preserve, I wonder who among us would like to approach the wife or mother whose husband or son has died in South Vietnam and ask them if they think this is a peace that should be maintained indefinitely. Do they mean peace, or do they mean we just want to be left in peace? There can be no real peace while one American is dying some place in the world for the rest of us. We are at war with the most dangerous enemy that has ever faced mankind in his long climb from the swamp to the stars, and it has been said if we lose that war, and in doing so lose this way of freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment that those who had the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening. Well, I think it’s time we ask ourselves if we still know the freedoms that were intended for us by the Founding Fathers.

Not too long ago two friends of mine were talking to a Cuban refugee, a businessman who had escaped from Castro, and in the midst of his story one of my friends turned to the other and said, “We don’t know how lucky we are.” And the Cuban stopped and said, “How lucky you are! I had someplace to escape to.” In that sentence he told us the entire story. If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man’s relation to man. This is the issue of this election. Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.

You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down–up to a man’s age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order–or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course.

In this vote-harvesting time, they use terms like the “Great Society,” or as we were told a few days ago by the President, we must accept a “greater government activity in the affairs of the people.” But they have been a little more explicit in the past and among themselves–and all of the things that I now will quote have appeared in print. These are not Republican accusations. For example, they have voices that say “the cold war will end through acceptance of a not undemocratic socialism.” Another voice says that the profit motive has become outmoded, it must be replaced by the incentives of the welfare state; or our traditional system of individual freedom is incapable of solving the complex problems of the 20th century. Senator Fullbright has said at Stanford University that the Constitution is outmoded. He referred to the president as our moral teacher and our leader, and he said he is hobbled in his task by the restrictions in power imposed on him by this antiquated document. He must be freed so that he can do for us what he knows is best. And Senator Clark of Pennsylvania, another articulate spokesman, defines liberalism as “meeting the material needs of the masses through the full power of centralized government.” Well, I for one resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me–the free man and woman of this country–as “the masses.” This is a term we haven’t applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, “the full power of centralized government”–this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don’t control things. A government can’t control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy.

Now, we have no better example of this than the government’s involvement in the farm economy over the last 30 years. Since 1955, the cost of this program has nearly doubled. One-fourth of farming in America is responsible for 85% of the farm surplus. Three-fourths of farming is out on the free market and has known a 21% increase in the per capita consumption of all its produce. You see, that one-fourth of farming is regulated and controlled by the federal government. In the last three years we have spent $43 in feed grain program for every bushel of corn we don’t grow.

Senator Humphrey last week charged that Barry Goldwater as President would seek to eliminate farmers. He should do his homework a little better, because he will find out that we have had a decline of 5 million in the farm population under these government programs. He will also find that the Democratic administration has sought to get from Congress an extension of the farm program to include that three-fourths that is now free. He will find that they have also asked for the right to imprison farmers who wouldn’t keep books as prescribed by the federal government. The Secretary of Agriculture asked for the right to seize farms through condemnation and resell them to other individuals. And contained in that same program was a provision that would have allowed the federal government to remove 2 million farmers from the soil.

At the same time, there has been an increase in the Department of Agriculture employees. There is now one for every 30 farms in the United States, and still they can’t tell us how 66 shiploads of grain headed for Austria disappeared without a trace and Billie Sol Estes never left shore.

Every responsible farmer and farm organization has repeatedly asked the government to free the farm economy, but who are farmers to know what is best for them? The wheat farmers voted against a wheat program. The government passed it anyway. Now the price of bread goes up; the price of wheat to the farmer goes down.

Meanwhile, back in the city, under urban renewal the assault on freedom carries on. Private property rights are so diluted that public interest is almost anything that a few government planners decide it should be. In a program that takes for the needy and gives to the greedy, we see such spectacles as in Cleveland, Ohio, a million-and-a-half-dollar building completed only three years ago must be destroyed to make way for what government officials call a “more compatible use of the land.” The President tells us he is now going to start building public housing units in the thousands where heretofore we have only built them in the hundreds. But FHA and the Veterans Administration tell us that they have 120,000 housing units they’ve taken back through mortgage foreclosures. For three decades, we have sought to solve the problems of unemployment through government planning, and the more the plans fail, the more the planners plan. The latest is the Area Redevelopment Agency. They have just declared Rice County, Kansas, a depressed area. Rice County, Kansas, has two hundred oil wells, and the 14,000 people there have over $30 million on deposit in personal savings in their banks. When the government tells you you’re depressed, lie down and be depressed.

We have so many people who can’t see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion that the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one. So they are going to solve all the problems of human misery through government and government planning. Well, now, if government planning and welfare had the answer and they’ve had almost 30 years of it, shouldn’t we expect government to almost read the score to us once in a while? Shouldn’t they be telling us about the decline each year in the number of people needing help? The reduction in the need for public housing?

But the reverse is true. Each year the need grows greater, the program grows greater. We were told four years ago that 17 million people went to bed hungry each night. Well, that was probably true. They were all on a diet. But now we are told that 9.3 million families in this country are poverty-stricken on the basis of earning less than $3,000 a year. Welfare spending is 10 times greater than in the dark depths of the Depression. We are spending $45 billion on welfare. Now do a little arithmetic, and you will find that if we divided the $45 billion up equally among those 9 million poor families, we would be able to give each family $4,600 a year, and this added to their present income should eliminate poverty! Direct aid to the poor, however, is running only about $600 per family. It would seem that someplace there must be some overhead.

So now we declare “war on poverty,” or “you, too, can be a Bobby Baker!” Now, do they honestly expect us to believe that if we add $1 billion to the $45 million we are spending…one more program to the 30-odd we have–and remember, this new program doesn’t replace any, it just duplicates existing programs–do they believe that poverty is suddenly going to disappear by magic? Well, in all fairness I should explain that there is one part of the new program that isn’t duplicated. This is the youth feature. We are now going to solve the dropout problem, juvenile delinquency, by reinstituting something like the old CCC camps, and we are going to put our young people in camps, but again we do some arithmetic, and we find that we are going to spend each year just on room and board for each young person that we help $4,700 a year! We can send them to Harvard for $2,700! Don’t get me wrong. I’m not suggesting that Harvard is the answer to juvenile delinquency.

But seriously, what are we doing to those we seek to help? Not too long ago, a judge called me here in Los Angeles. He told me of a young woman who had come before him for a divorce. She had six children, was pregnant with her seventh. Under his questioning, she revealed her husband was a laborer earning $250 a month. She wanted a divorce so that she could get an $80 raise. She is eligible for $330 a month in the Aid to Dependent Children Program. She got the idea from two women in her neighborhood who had already done that very thing.

Yet anytime you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, we are denounced as being against their humanitarian goals. They say we are always “against” things, never “for” anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so. We are for a provision that destitution should not follow unemployment by reason of old age, and to that end we have accepted Social Security as a step toward meeting the problem.

But we are against those entrusted with this program when they practice deception regarding its fiscal shortcomings, when they charge that any criticism of the program means that we want to end payments to those who depend on them for livelihood. They have called it insurance to us in a hundred million pieces of literature. But then they appeared before the Supreme Court and they testified that it was a welfare program. They only use the term “insurance” to sell it to the people. And they said Social Security dues are a tax for the general use of the government, and the government has used that tax. There is no fund, because Robert Byers, the actuarial head, appeared before a congressional committee and admitted that Social Security as of this moment is $298 billion in the hole. But he said there should be no cause for worry because as long as they have the power to tax, they could always take away from the people whatever they needed to bail them out of trouble! And they are doing just that.

A young man, 21 years of age, working at an average salary…his Social Security contribution would, in the open market, buy him an insurance policy that would guarantee $220 a month at age 65. The government promises $127. He could live it up until he is 31 and then take out a policy that would pay more than Social Security. Now, are we so lacking in business sense that we can’t put this program on a sound basis so that people who do require those payments will find that they can get them when they are due…that the cupboard isn’t bare? Barry Goldwater thinks we can.

At the same time, can’t we introduce voluntary features that would permit a citizen who can do better on his own to be excused upon presentation of evidence that he had made provisions for the non-earning years? Should we allow a widow with children to work, and not lose the benefits supposedly paid for by her deceased husband? Shouldn’t you and I be allowed to declare who our beneficiaries will be under these programs, which we cannot do? I think we are for telling our senior citizens that no one in this country should be denied medical care because of a lack of funds. But I think we are against forcing all citizens, regardless of need, into a compulsory government program, especially when we have such examples, as announced last week, when France admitted that their Medicare program was now bankrupt. They’ve come to the end of the road.

In addition, was Barry Goldwater so irresponsible when he suggested that our government give up its program of deliberate planned inflation so that when you do get your Social Security pension, a dollar will buy a dollar’s worth, and not 45 cents’ worth?

I think we are for an international organization, where the nations of the world can seek peace. But I think we are against subordinating American interests to an organization that has become so structurally unsound that today you can muster a two-thirds vote on the floor of the General Assembly among the nations that represent less than 10 percent of the world’s population. I think we are against the hypocrisy of assailing our allies because here and there they cling to a colony, while we engage in a conspiracy of silence and never open our mouths about the millions of people enslaved in Soviet colonies in the satellite nation.

I think we are for aiding our allies by sharing of our material blessings with those nations which share in our fundamental beliefs, but we are against doling out money government to government, creating bureaucracy, if not socialism, all over the world. We set out to help 19 countries. We are helping 107. We spent $146 billion. With that money, we bought a $2 million yacht for Haile Selassie. We bought dress suits for Greek undertakers, extra wives for Kenyan government officials. We bought a thousand TV sets for a place where they have no electricity. In the last six years, 52 nations have bought $7 billion worth of our gold, and all 52 are receiving foreign aid from this country.

No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this Earth. Federal employees number 2.5 million, and federal, state, and local, one out of six of the nation’s work force is employed by the government. These proliferating bureaus with their thousands of regulations have cost us many of our constitutional safeguards. How many of us realize that today federal agents can invade a man’s property without a warrant? They can impose a fine without a formal hearing, let alone a trial by jury, and they can seize and sell his property in auction to enforce the payment of that fine. In Chico County, Arkansas, James Wier overplanted his rice allotment. The government obtained a $17,000 judgment, and a U.S. marshal sold his 950-acre farm at auction. The government said it was necessary as a warning to others to make the system work. Last February 19 at the University of Minnesota, Norman Thomas, six-time candidate for President on the Socialist Party ticket, said, “If Barry Goldwater became President, he would stop the advance of socialism in the United States.” I think that’s exactly what he will do.

As a former Democrat, I can tell you Norman Thomas isn’t the only man who has drawn this parallel to socialism with the present administration. Back in 1936, Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the part of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. And he walked away from his party, and he never returned to the day he died, because to this day, the leadership of that party has been taking that party, that honorable party, down the road in the image of the labor socialist party of England. Now it doesn’t require expropriation or confiscation of private property or business to impose socialism on a people. What does it mean whether you hold the deed or the title to your business or property if the government holds the power of life and death over that business or property? Such machinery already exists. The government can find some charge to bring against any concern it chooses to prosecute. Every businessman has his own tale of harassment. Somewhere a perversion has taken place. Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment. Our Democratic opponents seem unwilling to debate these issues. They want to make you and I believe that this is a contest between two men…that we are to choose just between two personalities.

Well, what of this man that they would destroy? And in destroying, they would destroy that which he represents, the ideas that you and I hold dear. Is he the brash and shallow and trigger-happy man they say he is? Well, I have been privileged to know him “when.” I knew him long before he ever dreamed of trying for high office, and I can tell you personally I have never known a man in my life I believe so incapable of doing a dishonest or dishonorable thing.

This is a man who in his own business, before he entered politics, instituted a profit-sharing plan, before unions had ever thought of it. He put in health and medical insurance for all his employees. He took 50 percent of the profits before taxes and set up a retirement program, a pension plan for all his employees. He sent checks for life to an employee who was ill and couldn’t work. He provided nursing care for the children of mothers who work in the stores. When Mexico was ravaged by floods from the Rio Grande, he climbed in his airplane and flew medicine and supplies down there.

An ex-GI told me how he met him. It was the week before Christmas during the Korean War, and he was at the Los Angeles airport trying to get a ride home to Arizona for Christmas, and he said that there were a lot of servicemen there and no seats available on the planes. Then a voice came over the loudspeaker and said, “Any men in uniform wanting a ride to Arizona, go to runway such-and-such,” and they went down there, and there was this fellow named Barry Goldwater sitting in his plane. Every day in the weeks before Christmas, all day long, he would load up the plane, fly to Arizona, fly them to their homes, then fly back over to get another load.

During the hectic split-second timing of a campaign, this is a man who took time out to sit beside an old friend who was dying of cancer. His campaign managers were understandably impatient, but he said, “There aren’t many left who care what happens to her. I’d like her to know I care.” This is a man who said to his 19-year-old son, “There is no foundation like the rock of honesty and fairness, and when you begin to build your life upon that rock, with the cement of the faith in God that you have, then you have a real start.” This is not a man who could carelessly send other people’s sons to war. And that is the issue of this campaign that makes all of the other problems I have discussed academic, unless we realize that we are in a war that must be won.

Those who would trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state have told us that they have a utopian solution of peace without victory. They call their policy “accommodation.” And they say if we only avoid any direct confrontation with the enemy, he will forget his evil ways and learn to love us. All who oppose them are indicted as warmongers. They say we offer simple answers to complex problems. Well, perhaps there is a simple answer–not an easy answer–but simple.

If you and I have the courage to tell our elected officials that we want our national policy based upon what we know in our hearts is morally right. We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb by committing an immorality so great as saying to a billion now in slavery behind the Iron Curtain, “Give up your dreams of freedom because to save our own skin, we are willing to make a deal with your slave masters.” Alexander Hamilton said, “A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” Let’s set the record straight. There is no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there is only one guaranteed way you can have peace–and you can have it in the next second–surrender.

Admittedly there is a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson in history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face–that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight and surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand–the ultimatum. And what then? When Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we are retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary because by that time we will have weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side he has heard voices pleading for “peace at any price” or “better Red than dead,” or as one commentator put it, he would rather “live on his knees than die on his feet.” And therein lies the road to war, because those voices don’t speak for the rest of us. You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin–just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard ’round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn’t die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it’s a simple answer after all.

You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, “There is a price we will not pay.” There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater’s “peace through strength.” Winston Churchill said that “the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits–not animals.” And he said, “There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty.”

You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.

We will keep in mind and remember that Barry Goldwater has faith in us. He has faith that you and I have the ability and the dignity and the right to make our own decisions and determine our own destiny.

Thank you very much.

 

BACK TO SPEECH - above

The Earth is the LORD’s and the fullness thereof…

 “Blessed be the name of God for ever and ever: for wisdom and might are His: And He changeth the times and the seasons: He removeth kings, and setteth up kings: He giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding: He revealeth the deep and secret things: He knoweth what is in the darkness, and the light dwelleth with Him.

Daniel 2.20-22

…blessed be the Name of the LORD.

what if it’s true?

teacuppamela.pngI keep wondering how all this stuff is going to pan… Earlier today I heard a woman say that it would be a total miracle if JMcCain was elected President… and I replied that it would be a *miracle* if BarackObama were to be elected.  O… no, no, no… not bcz of any polls or anything like that but bcz he’s a man who’s largely come out of nowhere and has nothing clearly defined as far as policy or plausible solutions to the dilemma of the catastrophic financial and social problems facing this county (and around the world) and yet he *owns* the mainstream media outright — owns the opinion polls and doesn’t have to come clean on his records or public or private liaisons.

I’ve been writing, deleting, rewriting and thinking on this post for days — maybe weeks.  Each day as another story is posted (and ignored by the mainstream media — which I now call Obamedia)  I say to myself… what if it’s true?  I mean, how will all this play out in the end.  And, THE end is clearly coming into view.

I marvel that media turns a blind eye to all-things-Obama and seems to ignore questions or doubts — in fact, it’s eerily strange that practically ALL media — news, journalists, movie stars — actors and actresses — entertainers all seem to be in the boat with Obama — thus, giving the appearance that *everybody* is for him — everybody! Thus, the Obamedia.  A man nobody really knows - saying things no one can really define — is being hailed as a king.

A couple of the following links and dots were gathered days ago, but this morning, David Kupelian has a succinctly written article that puts everything out on the table and chronicles the Obama record — beginning with addressing Obama as the Manchurian Candidate.  As I think on that I wonder… what’s in all of this for Obama?  What’s in all of this for whoever’s behind his candidacy or probable potential  Presidency?   Tempature’s rising… the tide is swelling and yet, more is being uncovered — and then completely discredited by Obamedia and judicial power.

I read articles and listen to or watch coverage of different past events, alliances, etc., etc., concerning Barack Obama  (dot) and I have to just wonder if — well, two things: one, what if it’s true? and why doesn’t this play out in the mainstream?  Again, what if it’s true??  What if it’s true, for example, that Ayers is really the author of Dreams From My Father?  Or what if it’s true that Barack Obama’s grandmother was in the delivery room — in K-e-n-y-a (dot) — when Barack Obama was born?  What if it’s true?  So does that mean the quick trip to visit Grandma in Hawaii last week was a little bit of damage control — I mean, it’s interesting, isn’t it? I mean, what if she dies — this week — after that article surfaced — last week — ?  Will it become an Ashely Todd sort of deal made up for what? publicity?  But what if it’s not made up and what if it’s true?

My husband — listening to my meanderings said this stuff all sounds like the Vince Foster days - the Ron Brown day of the Clinton admin.  Yes, I thought so, too.  Then, like a lunatic, I started wondering… hmmmmm whatever did happen there, anyway… do you think the Clinton’s…? Nah…… too risky… but what if…  And then I think back on all the shady alliances - deaths, firings, missing files, propaganda… and consider that it was all hushed and swept under the carpet.  Will this be the case with Obama and his ’shady’ alliances?  Or — maybe more harrowing, will all these things come to light AFTER he’s elected President?

So, how about that Socialist Party membership? or this one? And what if BObama is not really a US Citizen and that being the case, how’s it going to play out in half of mainstream America -what is half of that half going to do — I mean, I’ve just gotta believe that some of those did take Civics and have at least a small understanding of the huge implications of that foreign birth and this campaign –and if it’s true — I mean: what if it’s true — then this is fraudulent campaign. I mean, I’m just sayin’ - that’s all.

My husband was reminding me (again!) of the great blessing of THESE days… and I see more and more why he says this.  He gets up from the breakfast table after Bible study and most mornings he says, these are exciting days to be alive!! Usually those words are accompanied by some hand gesture of accomplishment or victory!

We’re one day closer!! And I don’t mean one day closer to election day — but to That Day.

What a Day that will be…

   pamelasig2.jpg

There *is* o-n-l-y *one* Way.

ready or not.

Obama on abortion & ‘mistakes’ that ‘punish’

The first thing he’d do… as President. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.

So… what happened?

ditditdit dahdahdah ditditdit

teacuppamela.pngA little weekend reading…  Okay, a lot of weekend reading… especially if you connect the dots.

I think I hear it… the faint call is becoming louder:  … - - - …  is becoming …- - -…

I started thinking along this line recently as I have been thinking more and more: dot, dot, dot… connect the dots.  American people: dot, dot, dot… connect the dots!  The I considered Morse Code and the sound of dots and dashes or dits and dah’s.  So, in these days, if people are of a mind to hear, they’ll hear the dits…and the connecting of the dots will soon sound like:  ditditdit dahdahdah ditditditdit.  That’s SOS in Morse Code.

So, I posted the link to the Al Smith dinner last night, I thought I’d go ahead and post a few links… a few connect the dots links.  Yes… they are connect-the-dots and see the links to Barack Obama.  I’m thinking that one of the worst things for a candidate is: history.  It could also be the best thing for a candidate, too, for that matter.  Either way, historical record is friend or foe… Dot. Dot. Dot.

Dreams From My Father… is BarakO really the author as the title byline says?  (Dot)  Or is someone else?  (Dot) And is that someone else a friend of BarakO or is he just a colleague? You know… someone to whom BarakO really has no real tie. (Dot)  If the American public would have the time or take the time to review or compare writing styles as Jack Cashill has, they’d surely see a stunning connection and would have to face the question and come to the conclusion that Barak Obama’s literary style so strikingly reminiscent of William ‘Bill’ Ayers. (Dot)

The socialistic plan for America.  (Dot) Is it even remotely possible for 95% of the population to ‘get a taxcut’ considering… well, read on…

 Obama’s 95% Illusion - WSJ.com: “It’s a clever pitch, because it lets him pose as a middle-class tax cutter while disguising that he’s also proposing one of the largest tax increases ever on the other 5%. But how does he conjure this miracle, especially since more than a third of all Americans already pay no income taxes at all? There are several sleights of hand, but the most creative is to redefine the meaning of ‘tax cut.’ For the Obama Democrats, a tax cut is no longer letting you keep more of what you earn. In their lexicon, a tax cut includes tens of billions of dollars in government handouts that are disguised by the phrase ‘tax credit.’”
[can anyone say: socialism? (ditditditdahdahdahditditdit]

“Here’s the political catch. All but the clean car credit would be “refundable,” which is Washington-speak for the fact that you can receive these checks even if you have no income-tax liability. In other words, they are an income transfer — a federal check — from taxpayers to nontaxpayers. Once upon a time we called this “welfare,” or in George McGovern’s 1972 campaign a “Demogrant.” Mr. Obama’s genius is to call it a tax cut.” — the Amateur Economist  (Dot)

And what really, does BarakO say to the “Joe the Plumber” and the rest of the regular Joe’s of the US –Rick Moran, American Thinker  (Dot)

And so… what else is there about Ayers and his ties to him that BarakO doesn’t want the general public to see?   Connect, connect, connect.


(Dot)
And then there’s that very strange (but not so strange, and certainly not surprising) (little m)messiah factor.  Here and here. (Dot. Dot.) And then… let us not forget that a man is often known or understood by the company he keeps (or kept).  (Dot. Dot. Dot.)And then, don’t forget earlier BarakO ties.  (Dot)With the Washington Post endorsing BarakO and the NY Times apparently doing so in the upcoming Sunday edition…  it seems the man’s got it made.

 ”THE NOMINATING process this year produced two unusually talented and qualified presidential candidates. There are few public figures we have respected more over the years than Sen. John McCain. Yet it is without ambivalence that we endorse Sen. Barack Obama for president.

The choice is made easy in part by Mr. McCain’s disappointing campaign, above all his irresponsible selection of a running mate who is not ready to be president. It is made easy in larger part, though, because of our admiration for Mr. Obama and the impressive qualities he has shown during this long race. Yes, we have reservations and concerns, almost inevitably, given Mr. Obama’s relatively brief experience in national politics. But we also have enormous hopes.

Mr. Obama is a man of supple intelligence, with a nuanced grasp of complex issues and evident skill at conciliation and consensus-building.” —NYP

Ahhhh……….. that nuanced grasp.  (Dot)

“…having to do with keeping America safe in a dangerous world, it is a closer call. Mr. McCain has deep knowledge and a longstanding commitment to promoting U.S. leadership and values.   But Mr. Obama, as anyone who reads his books [[who writes his books??  (Dot) ]] can tell, also has a sophisticated understanding of the world and America’s place in it.”  [Riiight.] (Dot)

And then one last piece for today… Louis Farrakkhan (Dot): “A new beginning…” (Dot.) and this is the man who calls BarakO “… the herald of the Messiah.

The Washington Post article concludes in its defense to endorse Barak Obama (over the qualified but disappointing McCain),

“ANY PRESIDENTIAL vote is a gamble, and Mr. Obama’s résumé is undoubtedly thin. We had hoped, throughout this long campaign, to see more evidence that Mr. Obama might stand up to Democratic orthodoxy and end, as he said in his announcement speech, “our chronic avoidance of tough decisions.”

“But Mr. Obama’s temperament is unlike anything we’ve seen on the national stage in many years. He is deliberate but not indecisive; eloquent but a master of substance and detail; preternaturally confident but eager to hear opposing points of view. He has inspired millions of voters of diverse ages and races, no small thing in our often divided and cynical country. We think he is the right man for a perilous moment.”

… uh, Okay… what did they just say?  (Dot)

 pamelasig2.jpg   

Interesting…

McCain & Obama at a dinner… interesting.

Hard to sleep… I’m a mother.

teacuppamela.png Coyotes are whining and howling in the field.  They sound horrible and shrill — like someone is trying to kill them (sometimes I wish someone would).  Sounds seem magnified tonight… the dishwasher, the washing machine, the dryer, the icemaker and the water refilling it.  O, and the coyotes.  Suddenly, they’ve become quiet.  Maybe my neighbour said, that’s it…

I have been mulling over the bailout plan the senate is expected to vote on tomorrow.  I consider many silly scenarios and some sensible ones — several I have written to my reps and sens in the last few days.   Now, I’m no poli-sci major, nor econ major either, for that matter.  But I’m a mother and over the years, mothers figure things out pretty well.  I don’t know any mothers who are thinking this “bailout” or rescue is any sort of a sensible idea.

Mothers quickly learn the mechanics of supply and demand… they understand that the supply never seems to be adequate for the demand — but they don’t usually look for a bailout - they deal with lack of food, lack of sleep, lack of finances, lack of energy, lack of clothing that fits, lack of ability or whatever else is lacking and they figure out way to make it - to make ends meet, to adjust, to stretch, to flex, to wait or to go without.  It’s that simple.

Can you imagine a mother going to school where her teenage boy is a failing student and taking him on her lap and telling the teacher that she, herself, will be doing the assignments and taking the tests so that he won’t fail?

I mull this over… Wall Street is sort of comprised of investors — investments make the wheels of Wall Street turn.  Government has no business directing or redirecting or bailing out Wall Street — Wall Street will take care of itself if it’s not ‘bailed out’ and if investors taxes are not increased.  Simple supply and demand.  So what if wealth in this country will decline some - does the government, by going through with a bailout, possibly think that going further into debt will make or keep this country ‘rich’?  It’s crazy… all we can do is patiently wait and watch and pray.

Well… still can’t sleep.  It’s hard you know… to go to sleep when attempting to run the country the children aren’t all in yet… I’m a mother… patiently waiting… watching… praying.

 

  pamelasig2.jpg   marriedforkeepsweddingbands.jpg

the obamessiah ch ch ch chant change

The sad thing is… all the emotional, sensual, persuasive and innocent hope seems to me to be just a figment of imagination. And yet, the power of suggestion alone is astonishing. Consider the change change could do to change these days.

The USS Titanic - USS Usury

teacuppamela.pngI browse the news(and marvel!!)  and think of the many times the US has been likened to the Titanic… the ineffable, unsinkable US — the Titanic that was described as the ship that even “God himself could not sink…”  Well… I wonder, had he been alive, what would that man have said on April 15, 1912? So you suppose he would have said, “Hmmm, so, all that happened.”

Well, so, I’ve been thinking about the Titanic… I’ve been thinking about ‘end times’ and the state of the state and it’s hard not to make comparisons.  Really hard.

I remembered reading some bits about the Titanic and so had to look them up - here’s an interesting one: Dr. Charles Parkhurst, of the Madison Square Presbyterian Church, preached a sermon after the demise of the Titanic and in reference to society of that day [!!] he said,

quotebegin.gifThe picture that has hung before my eyes ever since last Tuesday morning has been the that of the victims staring meaningless at the gilded furnishings of this sunken palace of the sea… and there was no need for it. It is just so much sacrifice laid upon the alter of the dollar.”

Now, that, to many, might seem malevolent — even disrespectful of the lives lost in that tragedy.  That’s not intended here.  What’s intended is the similarity to these days… the gilded ship that is the US and the (proposed) gilding by Henry Paulson of the US Treasury or the US Usury.  You can’t help but wonder is Henry Paulson… Julius Caesar?

 quotebegin.gifSec. 8. Review.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.”  text of the proposal [scary!!] in a NYT article - full article here.

So, about the non-sinkability of the Titanic and the US today?  You’ve got to wonder:  What else is going on in the boiler room or the engine room of the ship?  And what about all the passengers? What will the great grandchildren be saying in 96 years?

Our oldest boy woke up Friday morning to his new reality… the gilded ship company he had worked for for nearly 10 years was no longer — O, he still has a job and, in fact, apparently had 3 job offers that very day — but that’s not what concerns me (that son has always been sort of a ‘golden boy’ and seizes the moment and works very hard).  What concerns me is that the taking over of WaMu was just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.  And what took down the Titanic?

An iceberg.

So, all that happened.

 pamelasig2.jpg

May the Lord God help us.

Standing on the shore…

stbx.jpgI’m standing on the shore watching the tide roll in and wash out again. Day after day, over and over and over it rolls.  Day after day more things are washed up on the beach, more things are uncovered at the water rushes back out to sea leaving the exposed shells and seaweed on the wet sand.  Little urchins burrow down and take cover in the wet sand.  Over and over the water flows… sand fleas, clams and other shells, starfish — occasionally a beautiful sand dollar is left sparkling in the sun.  What delight, what a prize each one is… now, something for everyone!

A beautiful boat sails by and I look up and observe that it’s severely listing first to the left and then to the right and seems as though it will capsize from all the people hurrying en masse to one side and then to the other.  Few seem to be questioning whether or not the boat is even going in the right direction.

I’ve been standing on the beach… occasionally pacing back and forth… should I wade into the rolling waters or just stand here observing the tide aware of the chilly wet san